Git Workflows and Best Practices

By the end of this final Git lesson you'll run the real workflow professional teams use — feature branches, pull requests and code review — and know when to rebase vs merge , how to stash and tag , and the habits that keep a shared repo healthy.

Learn Git Workflows and Best Practices in our free Git course — a beginner-friendly interactive lesson with worked examples, a practice exercise and a quick…

Part of the free Git course at LearnCodingFast — hands-on lessons with examples you run in your browser, plus practice exercises and a quick quiz.

What You'll Learn in This Lesson

1️⃣ The Feature-Branch Workflow

This is the workflow almost every team uses, and it rests on three rules: main is always deployable , every change lives on its own branch , and work reaches main only through a reviewed pull request . A branch is just an isolated line of work, so your half-finished feature can never break what's live. Read this worked example, then you'll run your own.

Your turn. The cycle below is almost complete — fill in the two blanks marked ___ using the hints in the comments, then run it.

2️⃣ Pull Requests & Code Review

A pull request (PR) is a request to merge your branch into main , with a built-in place for discussion. It's where code review happens (a teammate reads your changes and leaves comments) and where CI runs the tests automatically. You address feedback with ordinary commits — the PR updates itself. The single biggest factor in good review is size : small PRs get read carefully, giant ones get rubber-stamped.

3️⃣ Rebase vs Merge (and the Golden Rule)

Both merge and rebase combine two branches, but in opposite styles. Merge records a truthful, branching history and adds a merge commit. Rebase replays your commits on top of another branch to make history a clean straight line — but it rewrites commit IDs . That rewrite is exactly why there's a golden rule: never rebase history other people already have. Rebase your own private branch to tidy it; never rebase a shared branch like main .

4️⃣ Stashing Work & Tagging Releases

git stash shelves uncommitted changes so your working tree is instantly clean — perfect for "I'm mid-edit but must switch branches right now." git tag marks a commit as a named release so you can always find exactly what shipped. Use semantic versioning — MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH — so the version number itself tells people how big a change is.

Now you try. Fill in the four blanks to shelve some work, restore it, and tag a release — then run it.

5️⃣ Best Practices That Make You a Pro

Tools are only half the job — habits are the rest. Small, focused commits are easy to review and easy to revert. Clear messages in the imperative mood ("fix: stop double-charging on retry") turn your history into documentation. A good .gitignore keeps secrets and build junk out of the repo, and a protected main branch (no direct pushes, review required) stops accidents reaching production.

📋 Quick Reference

No blanks this time — just a brief and an outline. Carry out a complete feature-branch cycle end to end in a test repo, then check your output against the example in the comments. This is exactly how real features get shipped.

That's the whole Git course — from your first commit to running the same workflow professional teams use every day. You can now:

Where next? Put it into practice: open a pull request on a real GitHub project — your own, or your first open-source contribution. Then go deeper with GitHub Actions for CI/CD automation, and explore git bisect (find the commit that introduced a bug) and git cherry-pick (copy one commit between branches). You've got the foundation to collaborate on any codebase with confidence.

Practice quiz

• Browse all free courses
• Cheat sheets & quizzes
• Coding dictionary